<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Releases Safari 3 for Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonnymac.com/blog/2007/06/11/apple-releases-safari-3-for-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonnymac.com/blog/2007/06/11/apple-releases-safari-3-for-windows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:38:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interesting&#8230; Windows Users Don&#8217;t Like Their Apps to Look Nice. &#124; Visualrinse &#124; Design and Development by Chad Udell</title>
		<link>http://www.jonnymac.com/blog/2007/06/11/apple-releases-safari-3-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-5205</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting&#8230; Windows Users Don&#8217;t Like Their Apps to Look Nice. &#124; Visualrinse &#124; Design and Development by Chad Udell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonnymac.com/blog/2007/06/11/apple-releases-safari-3-for-windows/#comment-5205</guid>
		<description>[...] nice. It seems as though they like aliased text. I don&#8217;t get it. I can kind of understand the reluctant developer standpoint, but even still, anything that erodes the IE dominance is a good thing IMHO. Chastising a developer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nice. It seems as though they like aliased text. I don&#8217;t get it. I can kind of understand the reluctant developer standpoint, but even still, anything that erodes the IE dominance is a good thing IMHO. Chastising a developer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonnymac</title>
		<link>http://www.jonnymac.com/blog/2007/06/11/apple-releases-safari-3-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-5198</link>
		<dc:creator>jonnymac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonnymac.com/blog/2007/06/11/apple-releases-safari-3-for-windows/#comment-5198</guid>
		<description>Dan - I agree with you about not blaming Apple, but the fact remains that as long as one browser is not 100% standards-compliant, we&#039;ll need to test in every browser just to ensure the hacks we used didn&#039;t break our designs. While I like the idea of Safari taking over IE, I think Firefox has a much better start at this, and adding a third into the mix is only going to subtract from Firefox&#039;s lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; I agree with you about not blaming Apple, but the fact remains that as long as one browser is not 100% standards-compliant, we&#8217;ll need to test in every browser just to ensure the hacks we used didn&#8217;t break our designs. While I like the idea of Safari taking over IE, I think Firefox has a much better start at this, and adding a third into the mix is only going to subtract from Firefox&#8217;s lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Brendstrup</title>
		<link>http://www.jonnymac.com/blog/2007/06/11/apple-releases-safari-3-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-5196</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brendstrup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonnymac.com/blog/2007/06/11/apple-releases-safari-3-for-windows/#comment-5196</guid>
		<description>Or, from a Safari-browsing Mac-users perspective, today&#039;s announcement is awesome since it will force developers who have hitherto ignored Safari to take it into account when developing their sites... ;)

And don&#039;t worry, the whole point of Safari is that it is one of the most web standards-compliant browsers out there, so if you develop your sites according to the standards, chances are they&#039;ll just work in Safari.

You&#039;ll still have to work around all the shite bugs in IE, but don&#039;t blame Apple for that. Rather, in a few years when Safari has completely supplanted IE on Windows you can thank Apple that IE is no longer pissing up your leg all day... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, from a Safari-browsing Mac-users perspective, today&#8217;s announcement is awesome since it will force developers who have hitherto ignored Safari to take it into account when developing their sites&#8230; ;)</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t worry, the whole point of Safari is that it is one of the most web standards-compliant browsers out there, so if you develop your sites according to the standards, chances are they&#8217;ll just work in Safari.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll still have to work around all the shite bugs in IE, but don&#8217;t blame Apple for that. Rather, in a few years when Safari has completely supplanted IE on Windows you can thank Apple that IE is no longer pissing up your leg all day&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

